
Watching the film “12 Angry Men” wasn’t bad as I thought it would be. Due to the fact that it was an older movie in black & white it didn’t really grasp my attention at first. But when I got engaged, it was somewhat entertaining. I found it interesting how interactions went in a court room back then. It made me realize that people depend on other people’s thought process to generate their own. In the film there were twelve members of men who were selected to be a jury for a murder trial. The defendant was a young colored teen who was accused of killing his father. If the young teen was to be pronounced gulity he would be facing a death sentence in the electric chair. With the evidence provided for the jury, 11 out of the 12 men decided mark the young man as guilty. Due to the fact that 12 out of 12 men did not mark the defendant guilty the trail had to continue until the jury made a final decision. These men were already aggy that they had to be apart of the jury so they became even more frustrated that they had to stay longer until a decision was made. Jury #8 was the jury who found the boy not guilty. He was bothered that the other men were so quick to send a possible young man to be sentenced to death. Some parts of the case was bothering him, he wanted more time to think. Since the jury needs an unanimous decision to be made Jury #8 expresses his reasoning to the other jury to why the young teen could possibly not be guilty. After Jury #8 became vocal with his thoughts on the case the jury was issued to vote again to come to a verdict. However this time around jury #8 wasn’t involved in this round of voting. Sure enough out of the remaining men another jury decided to agree and votes not guilty so the trail continues. The longer the discussion the more jurors seem to realize what Jury #8 was saying makes sense. At the end of the conversation all jurors changed their verdict from guilty to not guilty expect one person Jury #3. Jury #3 had a personal grudge against defendant because of certain things he went through in his life. He felt the need to punish someone for his downfall in life. He had to let go of that past hurt and realize that a young boys life was on the line. He then made a change in decision and voted not guilty. Jury #8 was basically able to spare a young innocent boys life and prove his innocence. It’s crazy how at first the other men were so quick to vote the young boy as guilty without having that consious that he just might not be guilty. It took someone to go against the grain for the other men to actually see.

This class this semster was easier than expected. If time management and more effort was put in on my part I would’ve realized that from the beggining. In due time one will learn form their mistakes and strive for better.


![The Frightening Truth Behind Mind Control and Social Media [Halloween Special] | Hacker Noon](https://mmal20.school.blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/image-19.jpeg?w=306)











